ITIL Analysis by
Robert Perrine, PMP, ITIL-SM, MBB, CISA
Initial preview Fall 2004
Work in progress 2005
Reformatted November 2007

Introduction
I created this material to aid in the study and implementation of ITIL Service Delivery and Service Support. The content are my interpretation and may be flawed. Thus, no warranty is offered or implied as to the suitable of this material for use. If you find errors or discrepancies, please send an email and I will do my best to correct the situation. Please understand, however, that this is a voluntary work in progress.

Also, please remember that this is a supplement, not a replacement for the ITIL Service Delivery and Service Support guides. While this material may aid your study and implementation, I strongly emphasize the importance of reading the actual OGC materials.

Robert Perrine, PMP, ITIL-SM, MBB, CISA
robert@RobertPerrine.biz
Fall 2004 - 2007
Irvine, California, United States of America

Copyright
Fall 2004 - 2007, Irvine, California, USA, copyright by Robert E. Perrine, PMP, ITIL-SM, MBB, CISA.
Offered as is, with no warranty regarding the accuracy or suitability of this material. Copyright reserved. Please, however free to copy and share these documents with the following restrictions.

  • You may not charge for use or distribution of this material.
  • Your usage of this material is conditioned upon your compliance with the PMI Code of Ethics.
  • All distributions must be made with the intent to further the collected wisdom of humanity.
  • You may not remove my name or my copyright notices from these documents.

Key Process Diagrams
There are specific interconnections between the ITIL processes that are key to the understanding of ITIL. As time permits, these flows will be identified and documented.

The Service Level Agreement Process

The Service Level Agreement process flow

The Incident Escalation Process

The Incident Escalation process flow

The Problem Management Process

The Problem Management process flow

The Configuration Life Cycle

The Configuration Life Cycle

The Change Authorization Model

The Change Authorization Model

In the future I plan to work on diagrams for the remaining processes, including:

  • IT Financial
  • Capacity
  • IT Service Continuity
  • Availability
  • Service Desk
  • Release
  • Service Management

Analysis
The purpose for the Analysis sections is to expose the processes within the disciplines. The ITIL Service Delivery and Service Support guides provide a mixed set of process flows, descriptions and allusions. The goal for this part of this study material is to provide a consistent description for each of the process flows.

Service Level Management
Agree, Monitor, Report and Instigate
Service Level Requirements (SLRs) and customer and support perceptions of service levels currently delivered

Planning
|

Evaluate monitoring tools and upgrade if required also send customer a satisfaction survey or interview customer and support
List of services from configuration data or interviews with Service Desk and customers

|
Service Catalog (SC) updates
|

Update the Service Catalog as required
Service Level Agreement (SLA) template, draft SLA, Service Level Requirements (SLR), monitoring capabilities and SC

|
Draft
|

Manage expectations, update the draft SLA and update the SLR until they align
Draft SLA and SLR

|
Negotiate
|

All parties must have clear and consistent expectations on the finalized SLA and SLR
Preliminary agreement on SLA and SLR along with monitoring capabilities (manual & automated)

|
Preliminary monitoring
|

Verify the thresholds are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Timed correctly
Current Operational Level Agreements (OLAs) and Underpinning Contracts (UCs)

|
Review OLAs and UCs
|

Updated OLAs and UCs with monitoring for each threshold
Preliminary SLA, SLR and monitoring results along with updated OLAs and UCs

|
Agree
|

Agreed SLA signed by both the customer and support
Signed SLA

|
Publish
|

Awareness campaign to ensure all parties are aware of the details
SLA, SC and implemented monitoring

|
Monitor
|

Action plan to address exceptions
Monitoring results

|
Report
|

Distribute results to confirm compliance and highlight exception
Published reports compared to the SLAs

|
Service Review Meetings
|

Identification of weak areas can trigger a Service Improvement Program (SIP), corrective actions or additional training
Established schedule and scope defined in the Service Quality Plan

|
Review SLM procedures
|

Review and maintain the Service Level Management policies and procedures Note exceptions with recommendations
Existing SLAs, OLAs and UCs with a defined review schedule

|
Review SLAs, OLAs and UCs
|

Review and maintain the SLAs, OLAs and UCs. Note exceptions with recommendations
Results from review of the procedures, SLAs, OLAs and UCs

|
Instigate corrective actions

Requests for Change to agreed documents

Managing the Service Level Management Process
Identify the benefits delivered through Service Level Management

Awareness Campaign

Publicize the benefits from Service Level Management
When initiating Service Level Management or launching a new service

Planning Service Level Management

Build a Mission Statement and Service Quality Plan to define roles and responsibilities, escalations and notifications
Establish a schedule for periodic contact with customers

Proactive customer communication

Venting and identification of their satisfaction. Note: Satisfaction = Expectations - Perception
Detection of weaknesses that justify corrective actions

Service Improvement Program (SIP)

A focused project to address the weaknesses

Service Desk
Call Distribution Process
Event details, configuration details and relevant Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

Determine which process is appropriate
|

Gather details about this event
When the event is a predefined service

|
Actioned Infrastructure Incidents
|

Restart services, execute scripts, etc as defined in the workflow (MAP) assigned to this event
When the event is an Incident

|
Implement Incident Management
|

Branch to the Incident Management process
When the event is a Request for Change (RFC)

|
Facilitate Change Management
|

Create or update an RFC or implement change as authorized by the Change Management process
When the event is a request for status

|
Interface for the Service Management processes
|

Gather status and communicate the status to the caller
Service Request Process |  
When the event is a Service Request (SR)

|
Record
|

Create a Service Request (SR) Record with the contact info, detailed description and configuration details
SR, relevant processes and workload assessments

|
Classify
|

Assign the Category, Impact, Urgency and Priority, then assign to appropriate resource
Periodic reminders to update the customer, or action by the customer requesting status

|
Communicate
|

Get updates and give status
Formal sign off by the customer that the results are satisfactory

|
Closure

Update the SR with status and then close the SR

Proactive Service Desk Tasks
Customer history

Customer Assessment

Create a Service Request to document customer training needs and escalate for action
Information distribution request

Customer Advisory

Disseminate advisories such as the Forward Schedule of Changes, Release Schedule, etc.
Periodic reminders to update the customer, or action by the customer requesting status

Customer Contact

Status updates, informal customer satisfaction surveys and marketing opportunities
Periodic surveys as described in the SLA

Customer Surveys

Customer Satisfaction rating and exceptions that require action
When the Impact is significant or an SLA timer indicates that the SLA might be breached

Hierarchical Escalation

Status and optional recommendations
When there is an error in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Improved accuracy in the CMDB

Make the updates, where authorized, otherwise notify Configuration Management that there is an apparent error in the CMDB
Begin with a baseline User Handbook and then observe how the services are actually used

Maintain the User Handbook

Either update the User Handbook or document the revisions and forward them to the Handbook administrator
When opportunities arise and the customer is receptive or take opportunities to publish updates in newsletters and emails

Marketing

Market (sell) the benefits of the Service Desk, of this company and explain additional service offerings that could benefit this customer
Recurring Incidents

Problem identification

Match on existing Problem Record (PR) or create a new one

Managing the Service Desk Function
Classification and closure codes and criteria

Classification Process Review

Revised processes and revised lists of classification and closure codes
Reporting schedule and reporting requirements defined in SLAs, OLAs and UCs

Incident Reporting and Review

Reports with insight and recommendations
Established schedule and scope defined in the Service Desk policies and documentation

On-going training

Staff trained with people skills, knowledge of processes, procedures, tools and user applications & services
Established schedule and scope defined in the Service Desk policies and documentation

Periodic audits

Review and maintain the Service Desk policies, procedures and tools. Note exceptions with recommendations
Pre-release products in a clean staging environment with assistance from Release Management and Development

Pre-release Testing

Evaluation and recommendations regarding maintainability and usability
Pre-release products in a clean staging environment with assistance from Release Management and Development

Pre-release Training

Knowledge of functionality, known errors, problems and diagnostic tools
Establish a regular schedule to review active and exceptional Incidents against the relevant SLAs

Status Reviews

Clear communication and expectations with follow up on noted exceptions
Established schedule and scope defined in the Service Desk policies and documentation

Workload analysis

Reports with insight and recommendations

Incident Management
Incident Response Process
Event details, configuration details and relevant Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

Detect
|

Correlate event with configuration and verify service entitlement
When the event is actually a Service Request (SR)

|
Optional Functional Escalation to the Service Request Process
|

Create a new Service Request and then refer to the Service Desk function for the Service Request process
When the event is actually a Request for Change (RFC)

|
Optional Functional Escalation to Change Management
|

Link to an existing RFC or create a new RFC and then refer to the Change Management process flows
Event details and configuration details and SLAs

|
Record
|

Create an Incident Record (IR) to record the contact info, symptoms, initial diagnostics and configuration details
IR, prior Problem Records (PR), Known Errors (KE) and Requests for Change (RFC), configuration details and relevant SLAs

|
Classify
|

Update the IR with Category, Impact, Urgency, Priority and links to matched IRs, PRs, KEs or RFCs then assign to a resource and update the IR
IR and script (MAP) for initial support

|
Initial support
|

Update the IR with additional details and if restoration is done jump to Recovery
Transfer IR within IM or create new record to track external resources

|
Investigation
|

Update the IR with additional details and if restoration is done jump to Recovery
IR with appropriate linkages and history

|
Diagnosis
|

Document the work-around or solution with an action plan then transfer back to IM
Work-around or solution

|
Restore normal operations
|

Update the IR with restoration details
Means for recovering “lost data”

|
Recovery
|

Successful recovery of appropriate “lost data”
Formal sign off by the customer that the results are satisfactory

|
Closure

Update the IR with status and close the IR

Incident Ownership Tasks
When the Impact is significant or an SLA timer indicates that the SLA might be breached

Hierarchical Escalation

Status and recommendations
When there is an error in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Improved accuracy in the CMDB

Make updates where authorized, otherwise notify Configuration Management that there is an apparent error in the CMDB
Impact, SLA and established policies

Incident Communication

Proactively inform users about an Incident that is impacting their service
Periodic reminders to update the customer, or action by the customer requesting status

Incident Monitoring

Get updates and give status on the Incident, Problem, Known Error or Request for Change
Periodic reminders linked to the SLA or to Incident Management policies

Incident Tracking

Get updates from the resources (internal or external) working on the Incident, Problem, Known Error or Request for Change
When the Incident cannot be matched to an existing Problem Record or Known Error or when the Incident has a Major Impact

Invoke the Problem Management process

Link this IR to an existing Problem Record (PR) or create a new PR and then refer to the Problem Management process flows

Management Tasks for Incident Management
Reporting schedule and reporting requirements defined in SLAs, OLAs and UCs

Management information and reports

Reports with insight and recommendations
Established schedule and scope defined in the Incident Management Process documentation

Periodic audits

Review and maintain the Incident Management Process documents and relevant policies and procedures Note exceptions with recommendations

Classification Process Expanded from Annex 5D
Incident Record (IR)

Support staff allocation
|

Assign to a resource and update the IR
Configuration details and relevant SLAs

|
Basic fact finding
|

Update the IR with Category, Impact, Urgency, Priority
Prior Problem Records (PR), Known Errors (KE) and Requests for Change (RFC)

|
Inquiries on historical data
|

Update the IR with links to matched IRs, PRs, KEs or RFCs
IR and script (MAP) for initial support

|
Diagnostic data search
|

Update the IR with additional details
IR with appropriate linkages and history

|
Resolution attempt
|

If restoration is done jump to Recovery
When the Impact is significant or an SLA timer indicates that the SLA might be breached

|
Hierarchical Escalation
|

Status and recommendations, then allocate additional resources
When the Problem is not resolved in a timely manner

|
Functional Escalation to Problem Management

Link this IR to an existing Problem Record (PR) or create a new PR and then refer to the Problem Management process flows

Problem Management
Incident details, configuration details and SLA

Problem identification and recording
|

Create a new Problem Record, document possible workarounds or solutions and initiate the Problem Control sequence
Problem Control Process |  
Problem Record with details and a resource work-load evaluation

|
Problem classification
|

Set the Category, Impact, Urgency and Priority, assign resources and update the Problem Record
Possible tentative work-around or solution and history of recent changes

|
Problem investigation
|

Document the approved work-around or proposed solution
Techniques including Kepner & Tregoe, Ishikawa, Brainstorming and Flowcharting

|
Problem diagnosis and / or Error Identification
|

Document the Root Cause Create a Known Error and either initiate the Error Control sequence or branch to training or procedural updates
Error Control Process |  
Known Error, Problem and Incident details, configuration details and SLA

|
Error assessment
|

Create a Request for Change Set the Category, Impact, Urgency and Priority then update the Known Error Record
Execution through the Change and Release Management processes or by managing the vendor

|
Error resolution
Error Closure
Error Review

Structural Change with resolution to the satisfaction of the user Update (close) the Known Error, Problem and Incident Records
Proactive Problem Management
Fragile components, recurring problems, training needs, documentation gaps, vendor updates and user meetings

Problem trend analysis

Opportunities for cost justifiable improvements. Create a new Problem Record and initiate the Problem Control sequence
Volume of incidents, Impact, duration, costs to resolve, costs to the business

Proactive problem prevention

Opportunities for cost justifiable improvements. Create a new Problem Record and initiate the Problem Control sequence.

Management Tasks for Problem Management
Problem with a major impact and the Problem resolution steps

Major Problem Review

What was done right
What was done wrong
What could be done better
Actions to prevent recurrence
Reporting schedule and reporting requirements defined in SLAs, OLAs and UCs

Management information and reports

Reports with insight and recommendations regarding Problem Records, Known Errors and Requests for Change
Established schedule and scope defined in the Problem Management Process documentation

Review and maintain the Knowledge Base

Updated Knowledge Base with Problem Records, Known Errors, workarounds and solutions Also delivery training on the tools
Established schedule and scope defined in the Problem Management Process documentation

Periodic audits

Review and maintain the Problem Management Process documents and relevant policies and procedures. Note exceptions with recommendations

Kepner and Tregoe Analysis Process
Incidents, Impact, configuration details and SLAs

Define the problem
|

Problem statement with “occurrence” and “results”, but avoid jumping to a conclusion
Problem statement with history including a history of recent changes

|
Describe the problem
|

Identity -- what is the problem
Location -- where does it occur
Time -- when does it occur
Size -- what is affected
Problem details, diagnostic data where possible along with expertise and further investigation

|
Establish possible causes
|

Prioritized list of possible causes
Prioritized list of possible causes along with testing criteria and methodologies

|
Test the most probable cause
|

Test results and analysis data narrowing the list of probable causes
Identified probably cause and a resolution technique

|
Verify the true cause

User confirmation that the problem is resolved

Configuration Management
Core Configuration Management Process
At the start of the project and when starting on new aspects of the environment

Planning
|

Define and publish the scope, policies and procedures with special attention on the ”level” to be tracked
Inventory with all available records on ownership, licensing and usage

|
Identification and Registration
|

Create and update the Configuration Items (Cis) and document the relationships between them
Enforce policy that no physical change is made without going through Change Management

|
Control
|

Assurance the inventory is licensed, authorized, secured and accurately recorded in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB)
Status updates during the life cycle of a CI

|
Status Accounting
|

Maintained history with status on each CI to ensure traceability
Physical check of assets matched against the CMDB baseline

|
Verification and Audit
|

Detect errors and identify appropriate corrective actions
Periodically as defined in the Configuration Management policy or when an exception is detected

|
Reporting

Report on the inventory with emphasis on exceptions and recommended corrective actions

Supporting the Change Management Process
Proposed Request for Change (RFC)

Record
|

RFC entered into CMDB and linked to relevant details
RFC linked to appropriate configuration details

|
Assess impact
|

Risk assessment passed to Change Management
RFC with risk, impact and resource assessments

|
Tracking
|

RFC updates as requested by Change Management and the other parties to this RFC
Build documentation linked to the RFC

|
Librarian
|

Load the build documentation into the Configuration Management Database (CMDB)
Documentation on hardware, software, processes and training

|
Librarian
|

Check documentation into the Definitive Software Library (DSL)
RFC, FSC, RS and user acceptance testing sign off

|
Notification
|

Notification to all that will be impacted by this change
Release Unit with proper licensing and documentation

|
Librarian
|

Release Unit into DSL/DHS and distributed as required
Notification from the Change Manager that the Change was attempted

|
Closure

Configuration details updated and RFC closed with status. If the Change was backed-out, then create a new RFC and start over

Management Tasks for Configuration Management
Periodically as defined in the Configuration Management policy or on request

Baseline

Record the configuration at a point in time to support the Change, Release Verification and Audit processes
All personnel should report discrepancies

Correction

Verify, audit, correct and recommend appropriate corrective action
Incidents, Problems, Known Errors, Request for Change, etc

Data Administration

Ensure all relevant artifacts (physical and logical) can be entered, tracked and related
Automation tools to discover details about the environment for Identification or Verification

Discovery

Review the results and update the CMDB reporting on exceptions and plans for correction actions
Software, licensing, documentation and all supporting materials

Librarian

Update the CMDB and physically archive the master copies in the software/documentation libraries
Accurate inventory of licensing on-hand compared to licensing in use

License management

Report on exceptions and take responsibility for corrective actions
Established schedule and scope defined in the Configuration Management Process documentation

Management information and reports

Report on exceptions with recommendations for action
Established schedule and scope defined in the Configuration Management Process documentation

Periodic reviews

Review and maintain the Configuration Management Process documents and relevant policies and procedures. Note exceptions with recommendations
Software releases and hardware spares

Recording

Support Release Management by tracking the inventory in the DSL and Definitive Hardware Store (DHS)
Requests from the business and other ITIL disciplines

Service

Support the business and the ITIL disciplines through updates, reports and investigations
Evaluate alternatives when starting and manage the tool once it is in use

Tool administration

Cost effective tool, properly configured and administered including tuning and backups
When starting and periodically thereafter

Training

All staff trained on policies especially license management

Change Management
Normal Change Authorization Process
Proposed Request for Change (RFC)

Filter
|

Accept or reject the proposed RFC
RFC

|
Registration
|

RFC passed to Configuration Management for registration and assessment
RFC linked to appropriate configuration details

|
Assess risk
|

Risk assessment with Impact from Configuration and resources from Release Management
RFC with risk, impact and resource assessments

|
Categorization
|

RFC updated with Category, Impact, Urgency and Priority and assigned to Change Authorization Model
RFC with assessment and business justification

|
Approval through appropriate Change Authorization Model
|

RFC added to Forward Schedule of Changes (FSC) and Projected Service Availability (PSA)
RFC with justification

|
Change Authorization Model for Emergency Changes
|

(Refer to the Urgent Change Authorization Model described below)
RFC with justification

|
Change Authorization Model for Minor Changes
|

Change Manager can authorize or reject
RFC with documentation to define a Standard Process taken to the Change Advisory Board (CAB)

|
Change Authorization Model for “Standard” Changes
|

Well documented Standard Process released for implementation as needed
Establish schedule, publish agenda and provide RFC details and Change history

|
Change Authorization Model for Major Changes
|

Change Advisory Board (CAB) meets to authorize or reject
RFC with justification

|
Change Authorization Model for Massive Changes
|

Change Manager takes RFC to Executive Committee to authorize or reject
RFC with FSC and user acceptance testing sign off

|
Authorization
|

Configuration Management distributes Notification to relevant parties
At the appropriate time, the Change Implementer distributes the “release” and prepares for the implementation

|
Implementation
|

Release Unit installed and ready for User testing
Release Unit installed and ready for User testing

|
Evaluation
|

User sign off or agreement to back-out
Either change is in effect or it is cleanly backed-out

|
User acceptance
|

Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents
Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents

|
Closure
|

Configuration Management then closes the RFC
Periodically as defined in the Change Management policies

|
Post Implementation Review

Review all changes in the recent period and initiate appropriate corrective actions

Urgent Change Authorization Process
Identification of urgent need

Change Advisory Board / Emergency Committee
|

Authorize or reject based on Impact, Priority and Risk
Authorization of the preliminary RFC with detailed scope

|
Build and Test
|

Change Manager is responsible for supervision of build, test, implementation and optional back out
At the appropriate time, the Change Implementer distributes the “release” and prepares for the implementation

|
Implementation
|

Patch installed and ready for User testing
Release Unit installed and ready for User testing

|
Evaluation
|

User sign off or agreement to back-out
Either change is in effect or it is cleanly backed-out

|
User acceptance
|

Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents
Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents

|
Closure
|

Change Manager works with Configuration Management to document and close the RFC
Periodically as defined in the Change Management policies

|
Post ImplementationReview

Review all changes in the recent period and initiate appropriate corrective actions

Urgent Change Authorization Process
Periodically

Awareness Campaign

Emphasize benefits of the process and strive for complete compliance
Established schedule and scope defined in the Change Management Process documentation

Management information and reports

Report on exceptions with recommendations for action
Annually, or more frequently if needed

Periodic audits

Review all documentation, minutes, and logs and validate processes are followed
Established schedule and scope defined in the Change Management Process documentation

Periodic reviews

Review and maintain the Change Management Process documents and relevant policies and procedures. Note exceptions with recommendations
When beginning

Planning

Create Mission Statement, start awareness campaign, define change windows (slots), pick tool, document the process and train participants

Release Management
Standard Release Process
Request for Change (RFC) linked to appropriate configuration details

Assess resources
|

Resource assessment
RFC with assessment and business justification

|
Planning
|

Forward Schedule of Changes (FSC), Projected Service Availability (PSA) and Release Schedule (RS)
Procurement planning

|
Make or buy evaluation
|

Issue purchase orders or do in-house design
Authorized RFC with RS

|
Build
|

Monitor build progress and verify conformance with requirements
Release Unit into clean test area

|
Fit-for-Purpose Testing
|

Coordinate user acceptance testing
Documented back-out plan

|
Test the back-out plan
|

Sign off on the suitability of the backout plan
Release Unit into clean test area

|
Integrity
|

Ensure release is licensed, secure, traceable and as per authorization
User documentation

|
Training
|

Coordinate user and support training
Fit-for-purpose test results

|
Release Acceptance
|

User acceptance testing sign off
RFC, FSC, RS and user acceptance testing sign off

|
Verify notification is distributed by the Configuration Manager through the Service Desk
|

Notification to all who will be impacted by this change
Release Unit with proper licensing and documentation

|
Distribution
|

Release Unit into DSL/DHS and distributed as required
At the appropriate time

|
Implement
|

Release Unit installed and ready for User evaluation
Release Unit installed and ready for User evaluation

|
Audit integrity as installed
|

User sign off or agreement to back-out
Either change is in effect or it is cleanly backed-out

|
Activate release or execute the back-out process
|

Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents
Stable production environment along with list of change induced incidents

|
Ensure configuration details are properly updated

Configuration details updated and RFC closed

Management Tasks for Release Management
Periodically

Awareness Campaign

Emphasize benefits of the process and strive for complete compliance
Established schedule and scope defined in the Release Management Process documentation

Management information and reports

Report on exceptions with recommendations for action
Established schedule and scope defined in the Release Management Process documentation

Periodic reviews

Review and maintain the Release Management Process documents and relevant policies and procedures Note exceptions with recommendation
When beginning

Planning

Create Mission Statement, start awareness campaign, document the process and train participants

Service Management
The ITIL Process Improvement Model
Incentive to change

Where do we want to be?
|

Vision Statement and documentation describing the business objectives to be achieved in suffi cient detail to be effective
Interviews and review of current documentation

|
Where are we now?
|

Assessment of the “as-is” organizational model, processes and policies
“Gap analysis” comparing the “as-is” with the “to-be”

|
How do we get where we want to be?
|

Documented and agreed action plan describing the “to-be” proposal
Defi ned metrics and methods for measuring and assessing those metrics

|
How do we know when we have arrived?

Reporting focused on exceptions with action plans for correcting weaknesses

The Demming Cycle
Incentive to change

Plan
|

Vision Statement and documentation describing the business objectives to be achieved in suffi cient detail to be effective
Documented and agreed action plan describing the “to-be” proposal

|
Do
|

Changes implemented
“Gap analysis” comparing the “asis” with the “to-be”

|
Check
|

Reporting focused on exceptions with action plans for correcting weaknesses
Documented and agreed action plan describing the required corrective actions

|
Act

Take action to bring the current state closer to the planned state

In the future I plan to work on diagrams for the remaining processes, including:

  • IT Financial
  • Capacity
  • IT Service Continuity
  • Availability

Revision History
Date Version Author Description
1 Oct 2004~0.1Robert PerrineInitial work on the Dependencies.
26 Oct 20040.2Robert PerrineReleased version of the Dependencies.
26 Oct 20040.3Robert PerrineInitial version of the Synopsis pages.
30 Oct 20040.4Robert PerrineReleased version of the Synopsis pages.
07 Nov 20040.5Robert PerrineInitial version of the Memory pages.
21 Nov 20040.6Robert PerrineReleased version of the Memory pages.
27 Nov 20040.7Robert PerrineConsolidated Memory and Synopsis into this ITIL Analysis guide.
29 Nov 20040.8Robert PerrineConsolidated Dependencies into this ITIL Analysis guide.
30 Nov 20040.9Robert PerrineInitial work on Analysis sections
2 Dec 20041.0Robert PerrineInitial work on Key Flow Diagrams
5 Dec 20041.1Robert PerrineInitial work on Collaborative sections
6 Dec 20041.2Robert PerrineContinued work on Key Flows, Analysis and Collaborative
12 May 20051.3Robert PerrineMinor tweaks before publishing via my web site.
26 Nov 20051.4Robert PerrineRemoved content now duplicated in the Quick Reference
11 Nov 20071.5Robert PerrineMoved some content to ITIL Dependencies and reformatted the remainder.