| contents |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The theology espoused by Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar is known as the theology of retribution. In brief, this theology begins with a cause: God is pure and holy and will judge all. Then this theology links that cause with an effect: those who sin are punished. This is simple cause and effect thinking with the tolerance for a brief span of time. This is a bit more advanced than the thinking of a four year old. Perhaps, instead, we are dealing with the theology of a ten year old. Your friend cheats on one test and gets away with it. Later your friend gets a poor grade on a test where he or she actually had the right answer. But, since God and teachers have long memories, we attribute the poor grade on the second test to some judgment about their efforts on the first test. In business, we struggle and one product sells well even though we know it is substandard. Then we work to make the next product even better but when it does not sell as well as expected we attribute that failure to the sins of our previous product. We seldom stop to consider the environment, the competition, the changes in our customer preferences. We short circuit all that systems thinking and fall back on simple linear cause and effect with the addition of a brief time delay.
I also find it in John 9:1-41. It is important to understand that there are aspects of this theology that are consistent with the teachings of Jesus. In Matthew 25:32 Jesus prophecies about the final judgment and tells us that he will separate humanity like a shepherd separates his sheep from his goats. The theme of separation is consistent. The theme of judgment is consistent. The “cause” described by Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar is accurate. So there is something amiss in the linkage they make between this cause and the resulting effect. I believe we can find the error in their logic by studying the story of a blind man in John 9. The heart of the theology of retribution is summarized in John 9:31 when the man who had been blind says: “God does not listen to sinners. God listens to the ones who worship him and obey his commands.” The next section of this article is based on the technique I first introduced in my article called “Dancing with Pilate”. It is posted on my website at http://www.robertPerrine.biz. Please review that article if the process I use below is unclear. In brief, I examine each verse or fragment of a verse and search for concepts of dissonance and love. Dissonance scores a plus one while distracters score a minus one. Antagonism, the value I originally used on the horizontal grid scores a plus one. Love, for an odd reason described elsewhere, scores a minus one. The table, shown below, illustrates this scoring in John 9.
What happens next is that the Pharisees enter into chaos. The high level of dissonance that was created by Jesus, coupled with the high level of conflict that they have generated results in chaos. It is the blind man who then brings us back into a transforming environment. He appears to have failed to persuade the Pharisees. But his speech is there to give them witness, to help clarify his own thinking and also to give witness to us about what has happened. And thus, in John 9:33 the blind man renews his faith in God and is transformed into a deeper understanding of how God acts in our lives. Again, the Pharisees try to pull him out of his transformation but he returns to transformation and recognizes that it is Jesus who has changed his life.
The condemnation of Job from Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar is no different than the condemnation of the blind man by the Pharisees. Jesus, in John, tells us that the blindness was to be used to help us learn. The author of Job tells us that it was Satan who instigated the evil and then allows Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar to blame Job so that it can be made clear that we do not have all the information. We do not know enough to judge. And when we judge anyway then we push God off his throne and try to seat ourselves instead. By implication, the corollary to the Theology of Retribution is also overturned. That theology is today commonly known as the theology of the Kings Kid’s. Basically, this theology assumes that God rewards those who are faithful and implies a linear cause and effect relationship. Thus, if you have been rewarded, it is falsely assumed that you were aligned with God. In reality, this is simply Eve’s theology resurrected and repackaged. The only alignment we can achieve without a transformation is an alignment with our own desires. Now it is time to allow Job to testify on his own behalf. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contents |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||